netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/8] ipq5018: enable ethernet support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:
 <TYZPR01MB55568359B28ABD550C8ECCDFC9752@TYZPR01MB5556.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 22:45:26 +0800
From: Ziyang Huang <hzyitc@...look.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, krzk@...nel.org
Cc: mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com, alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com,
 richardcochran@...il.com, p.zabel@...gutronix.de, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
 angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] ipq5018: enable ethernet support

在 2024/1/21 23:51, Andrew Lunn 写道:
> On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 08:40:39PM +0800, Ziyang Huang wrote:
>> Enable ethernet support for IPQ5018.
>>
>> Praveenkumar I (1):
>>    clk: qcom: support for duplicate freq in RCG2 freq table
>>
>> Ziyang Huang (7):
>>    net: phy: Introduce Qualcomm IPQ5018 internal PHY driver
>>    phy: Introduce Qualcomm ethernet uniphy driver
>>    net: stmmac: Introduce Qualcomm IPQ50xx DWMAC driver
>>    clk: qcom: gcc-ipq5018: correct gcc_gmac0_sys_clk reg
>>    net: mdio: ipq4019: support reset control
>>    arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5018: enable ethernet support
>>    arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5018-rdp432-c2: enable ethernet support
> 
> Hi Ziyang
> 
> You failed to Cc: a number of Maintainers here. e.g for the PHY and
> MDIO patches i would of expected the PHY and maintainers to be Cc:ed.
> 
>       Andrew

Hi Andrew,

Sorrr for my mistake. For easily comparison, I added these patches to 
git index, which mess up ./scripts/checkpatch.pl and 
./scripts/get_maintainer.pl and led to wrong results. Will add correct 
Cc: in next patches.