netdev - Re: [PATCH 7/8] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5018: enable ethernet support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:
 <TYZPR01MB5556603EA4C5D7BAF9C27C6AC9752@TYZPR01MB5556.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 23:52:30 +0800
From: Ziyang Huang <hzyitc@...look.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com, alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com,
 richardcochran@...il.com, p.zabel@...gutronix.de, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
 angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5018: enable ethernet support

在 2024/1/22 0:45, Andrew Lunn 写道:
> On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 08:42:36PM +0800, Ziyang Huang wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Ziyang Huang <hzyitc@...look.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5018.dtsi | 120 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>   1 file changed, 116 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5018.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5018.dtsi
>> index e502a3ecf4b7..b36e5c2136b7 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5018.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5018.dtsi
>> @@ -94,6 +94,63 @@ soc: soc@0 {
>>   		#size-cells = <1>;
>>   		ranges = <0 0 0 0xffffffff>;
>>   
>> +		mdio0: mdio@...00 {
>> +			#address-cells = <1>;
>> +			#size-cells = <0>;
>> +			compatible = "qcom,ipq5018-mdio", "qcom,qca-mdio";
>> +			reg = <0x88000 0x64>;
>> +			resets = <&gcc GCC_GEPHY_MDC_SW_ARES>,
>> +				 <&gcc GCC_GEPHY_DSP_HW_ARES>;
> 
> What do these two resets do? An MDIO bus controller is unlikely to
> have a DSP in it. That is something a PHY is more likely to have. An
> MDIO bus controller does have an MDC line, but why is it
> GCC_GEPHY_MDC_SW_ARES not GCC_MDIO_MDC_SW_ARES? So this again makes me
> think this is a PHY reset, so should be in the PHY node.
> 

IPQ5018 has two mdio bus. mdio0 is an internal bus which only connects 
to internal PHY while mdio1 is outgoing and can be used to connect PHY 
or switch.

So I thought GCC_GEPHY_MDC_SW_ARES is for mdio0 and GCC_MDIO_MDC_SW_ARES 
is for mdio1.

GCC_GEPHY_DSP_HW_ARES is seem like PHY reset. But if we don't deassert 
it, the phy node can't be scaned. So I add it here like what reset-gpios 
do - to reset PHY or switch.

> A device tree binding will help sort this out.

Base on the functions I explained, I can't write the accurate names and 
number of resets here.

> 
> 
>      Andrew
> 
> ---
> pw-bot: cr