[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87le8hgrzq.fsf@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 10:06:58 -0800
From: Rahul Rameshbabu <rrameshbabu@...dia.com>
To: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>, Jakub Kicinski
<kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Radu Pirea <radu-nicolae.pirea@....nxp.com>, "David
S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 2/2] net: macsec: Only require headroom/tailroom
from offload implementer if .mdo_insert_tx_tag is implemented
On Sun, 21 Jan, 2024 10:29:08 +0100 Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net> wrote:
> 2024-01-18, 11:18:07 -0800, Rahul Rameshbabu wrote:
>> A number of MACsec offload implementers do not implement
>> .mdo_insert_tx_tag. These implementers also do not specify the needed
>> headroom/tailroom and depend on the default in the core MACsec stack.
>
> FWIW, I had the same concern when Radu submitted these changes, and he
> answered that the extra room was only needed for SW, not for offload:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/a5ef22bc-2457-5eef-7cff-529711c5c242@oss.nxp.com/
Thanks, this conversation was helpful.
>
> I'm not really objecting to this patch, but is it fixing a bug? If so,
> it would be useful to describe the problem you're seeing in the commit
> message for this change.
It isn't. I was not sure if other drivers depended on the default
headroom/tailroom set by the MACsec stack.
>
> Does your driver require the default headroom/tailroom?
>
mlx5 does not. I am very open to dropping this patch in the series.
--
Thanks,
Rahul Rameshbabu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists