lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: 
 <BN9PR18MB4251944C1AE34057DACD7556DB742@BN9PR18MB4251.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 09:59:46 +0000
From: Elad Nachman <enachman@...vell.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo
 Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski
	<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [EXT] [PATCH net-next] net: marvell,prestera: Fix example PCI bus
 addressing



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> Sent: Monday, January 22, 2024 7:35 PM
> To: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>; Eric Dumazet
> <edumazet@...gle.com>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>; Paolo Abeni
> <pabeni@...hat.com>; Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>; Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>;
> Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; devicetree@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: [EXT] [PATCH net-next] net: marvell,prestera: Fix example PCI bus
> addressing
> 
> External Email
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> The example for PCI devices has some addressing errors. 'reg' is written as if
> the parent bus is PCI, but the default bus for examples is 1 address and size
> cell. 'ranges' is defining config space with a size of 0. Generally, config space
> should not be defined in 'ranges', only PCI memory and I/O spaces. Fix these
> issues by updating the values with made-up, but valid values.
> 
> This was uncovered with recent dtschema changes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/marvell,prestera.yaml | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/marvell,prestera.yaml
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/marvell,prestera.yaml
> index 5ea8b73663a5..16ff892f7bbd 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/marvell,prestera.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/marvell,prestera.yaml
> @@ -78,8 +78,8 @@ examples:
>      pcie@0 {
>          #address-cells = <3>;
>          #size-cells = <2>;
> -        ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0>;
> -        reg = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0>;
> +        ranges = <0x02000000 0x0 0x100000 0x10000000 0x0 0x0>;
> +        reg = <0x0 0x1000>;
>          device_type = "pci";
> 
>          switch@0,0 {
> --
> 2.43.0
> 

This yaml has a mix-up of device P/N (belonging to AC3, BC2) and PCIe IDs (belonging to AC3X, Aldrin2)
Looks like a part of the yaml was updated, and another part was not

There is a reference here of actual usage of prestera switch device:
https://github.com/dentproject/linux/blob/dent-linux-5.15.y/arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/accton-as4564-26p.dts

So actual ranges and reg could be used instead of made up ones.

But the actual real life dts places the prestera at the top level of the dts, not under pci.

I am not aware of any dts/dtsi using such kind of switch node under pcie node, similar to the example given in the yaml file, and did not manage to find any under latest linux-next for both arm and arm64 dts directories (please correct me here if I am wrong).

So the question here is if this pci example really necessary for the prestera device, or can be removed altogether (which is what I think is best to do).

Elad.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ