[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ8uoz2W6nqJ=vk6+RR7zEohkv7CTBO+2KsAQAfgp=gf_5-ycA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 09:20:26 +0100
From: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...il.com>
To: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
andrii@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, magnus.karlsson@...el.com,
bjorn@...nel.org, echaudro@...hat.com, lorenzo@...nel.org,
martin.lau@...ux.dev, tirthendu.sarkar@...el.com, john.fastabend@...il.com,
horms@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 bpf 02/11] xsk: make xsk_buff_pool responsible for
clearing xdp_buff::flags
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 at 23:16, Maciej Fijalkowski
<maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com> wrote:
>
> XDP multi-buffer support introduced XDP_FLAGS_HAS_FRAGS flag that is
> used by drivers to notify data path whether xdp_buff contains fragments
> or not. Data path looks up mentioned flag on first buffer that occupies
> the linear part of xdp_buff, so drivers only modify it there. This is
> sufficient for SKB and XDP_DRV modes as usually xdp_buff is allocated on
> stack or it resides within struct representing driver's queue and
> fragments are carried via skb_frag_t structs. IOW, we are dealing with
> only one xdp_buff.
>
> ZC mode though relies on list of xdp_buff structs that is carried via
> xsk_buff_pool::xskb_list, so ZC data path has to make sure that
> fragments do *not* have XDP_FLAGS_HAS_FRAGS set. Otherwise,
> xsk_buff_free() could misbehave if it would be executed against xdp_buff
> that carries a frag with XDP_FLAGS_HAS_FRAGS flag set. Such scenario can
> take place when within supplied XDP program bpf_xdp_adjust_tail() is
> used with negative offset that would in turn release the tail fragment
> from multi-buffer frame.
>
> Calling xsk_buff_free() on tail fragment with XDP_FLAGS_HAS_FRAGS would
> result in releasing all the nodes from xskb_list that were produced by
> driver before XDP program execution, which is not what is intended -
> only tail fragment should be deleted from xskb_list and then it should
> be put onto xsk_buff_pool::free_list. Such multi-buffer frame will never
> make it up to user space, so from AF_XDP application POV there would be
> no traffic running, however due to free_list getting constantly new
> nodes, driver will be able to feed HW Rx queue with recycled buffers.
> Bottom line is that instead of traffic being redirected to user space,
> it would be continuously dropped.
>
> To fix this, let us clear the mentioned flag on xsk_buff_pool side at
> allocation time, which is what should have been done right from the
> start of XSK multi-buffer support.
>
> Fixes: 1bbc04de607b ("ice: xsk: add RX multi-buffer support")
> Fixes: 1c9ba9c14658 ("i40e: xsk: add RX multi-buffer support")
> Fixes: 24ea50127ecf ("xsk: support mbuf on ZC RX")
> Signed-off-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c | 1 -
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_xsk.c | 1 -
> net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c | 3 +++
> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c
> index e99fa854d17f..fede0bb3e047 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c
> @@ -499,7 +499,6 @@ int i40e_clean_rx_irq_zc(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, int budget)
> xdp_res = i40e_run_xdp_zc(rx_ring, first, xdp_prog);
> i40e_handle_xdp_result_zc(rx_ring, first, rx_desc, &rx_packets,
> &rx_bytes, xdp_res, &failure);
> - first->flags = 0;
> next_to_clean = next_to_process;
> if (failure)
> break;
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_xsk.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_xsk.c
> index 5d1ae8e4058a..d9073a618ad6 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_xsk.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_xsk.c
> @@ -895,7 +895,6 @@ int ice_clean_rx_irq_zc(struct ice_rx_ring *rx_ring, int budget)
>
> if (!first) {
> first = xdp;
> - xdp_buff_clear_frags_flag(first);
> } else if (ice_add_xsk_frag(rx_ring, first, xdp, size)) {
> break;
> }
> diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c b/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c
> index 28711cc44ced..dc5659da6728 100644
> --- a/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c
> +++ b/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c
> @@ -555,6 +555,7 @@ struct xdp_buff *xp_alloc(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool)
>
> xskb->xdp.data = xskb->xdp.data_hard_start + XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM;
> xskb->xdp.data_meta = xskb->xdp.data;
> + xskb->xdp.flags = 0;
>
> if (pool->dma_need_sync) {
> dma_sync_single_range_for_device(pool->dev, xskb->dma, 0,
> @@ -601,6 +602,7 @@ static u32 xp_alloc_new_from_fq(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool, struct xdp_buff **xd
> }
>
> *xdp = &xskb->xdp;
> + xskb->xdp.flags = 0;
Thanks for catching this. I am thinking we should have an if-statement
here and only do this when multi-buffer is enabled. The reason that we
have two different paths for aligned mode and unaligned mode here is
that we do not have to touch the xdp_buff at all at allocation time in
aligned mode, which provides a nice speed-up. So let us only do this
when necessary. What do you think? Same goes for the line in
xp_alloc_reused().
> xdp++;
> }
>
> @@ -621,6 +623,7 @@ static u32 xp_alloc_reused(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool, struct xdp_buff **xdp, u3
> list_del_init(&xskb->free_list_node);
>
> *xdp = &xskb->xdp;
> + xskb->xdp.flags = 0;
> xdp++;
> }
> pool->free_list_cnt -= nb_entries;
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists