| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20240124082255.7c8f7c55@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 08:22:55 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com> Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "netdev-driver-reviewers@...r.kernel.org" <netdev-driver-reviewers@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [ANN] net-next is OPEN On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 10:59:36 -0500 Willem de Bruijn wrote: > David Ahern wrote: > > On 1/23/24 8:20 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > > It groups all patches outstanding in patchwork (which build cleanly). > > > I'm hoping we could also do HW testing using this setup, so batching > > > is a must. Not 100% sure it's the right direction for SW testing but > > > there's one way to find out :) > > > > > > > Really cool. Thanks for spending time to make this happen. > > Just to add to the choir: this is fantastic, thanks! > > Hopefully it will encourage people to add kselftests, kunit tests or > other kinds that now get continuous coverage. Fingers crossed :) > Going through the failing ksft-net series on > https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/status.html, all the tests I'm > responsible seem to be passing. Here's a more handy link filtered down to failures (clicking on the test counts links here): https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/contest.html?branch=net-next-2024-01-24--15-00&executor=vmksft-net-mp&pass=0 I have been attributing the udpg[rs]o and timestamp tests to you, but I haven't actually checked.. are they not yours? :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists