[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240124185403.1104141-1-john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 10:53:59 -0800
From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
To: jakub@...udflare.com,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
john.fastabend@...il.com,
andrii@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] transition sockmap testing to test_progs
Its much easier to write and read tests than it was when sockmap was
originally created. At that time we created a test_sockmap prog that
did sockmap tests. But, its showing its age now. For example it reads
user vars out of maps, is hard to run targetted tests, has a different
format from the familiar test_progs and so on.
I recently thought there was an issue with pop helpers so I created
some tests to try and track it down. It turns out it was a bug in the
BPF program we had not the kernel. But, I think it makes sense to
start deprecating test_sockmap and converting these to the nicer
test_progs.
So this is a first round of test_prog tests for sockmap cork and
pop helpers. I'll add push and pull tests shortly. I think its fine,
maybe preferred to review smaller patchsets, to send these
incrementally as I get them created.
Thanks!
v2: fix unint vars in some branches from `make RELEASE=1`
John Fastabend (4):
bpf: sockmap, add test for sk_msg prog pop msg helper
bpf: sockmap, add a sendmsg test so we can check that path
bpf: sockmap, add a cork to force buffering of the scatterlist
bpf: sockmap test cork and pop combined
.../bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_helpers.h | 18 +
.../bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_msg_helpers.c | 353 ++++++++++++++++++
.../bpf/progs/test_sockmap_msg_helpers.c | 67 ++++
3 files changed, 438 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_msg_helpers.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sockmap_msg_helpers.c
--
2.33.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists