netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/5] virtio_ring: introduce virtqueue_get_buf_ctx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACGkMEvv-ggpiVYeziPaPE4qK7dbZv4BxYeUkFJ9jFqzyhnx0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 14:54:05 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, 
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, 
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, 
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>, 
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, 
	bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/5] virtio_ring: introduce virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_dma()

On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 3:59 PM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
> introduce virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_dma() to collect the dma info when
> get buf from virtio core for premapped mode.
>
> If the virtio queue is premapped mode, the virtio-net send buf may
> have many desc.

This feature is not specific to virtio-net, so we can let "for example ..."

> Every desc dma address need to be unmap. So here we
> introduce a new helper to collect the dma address of the buffer from
> the virtio core.

Let's explain why we can't (or suboptimal to) depend on a driver to do this.

>
> Because the BAD_RING is called (that may set vq->broken), so
> the relative "const" of vq is removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
>  drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 174 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  include/linux/virtio.h       |  16 ++++
>  2 files changed, 142 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> index 49299b1f9ec7..82f72428605b 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> @@ -362,6 +362,45 @@ static struct device *vring_dma_dev(const struct vring_virtqueue *vq)
>         return vq->dma_dev;
>  }
>
> +/*
> + *     use_dma_api premapped -> do_unmap
> + *  1. false       false        false
> + *  2. true        false        true
> + *  3. true        true         false
> + *
> + * Only #3, we should return the DMA info to the driver.

So the code has a check for dma:

        if (!dma)
                return false;

For whatever the case, we need a better comment here.

So we had: use_dma_api, premapped, do_unmap and dma now. I must say
I'm totally lost in this maze. It's a strong hint the API is too
complicated and needs to be tweaked.

For example, is it legal to have do_unmap be false buf DMA is true?

Here're suggestions:

1) rename premapped to buffer_is_premapped
2) rename do_unmap to buffer_need_unmap or introduce a helper

bool vring_need_unmap_buffer()
{
        return use_dma_api && !premapped;
}

3) split the getting dma info logic into an helper like vritqueue_get_dma_info()

so we can do

if (!vring_need_unmap_buffer()) {
        virtqueue_get_dma_info()
        return;
}

4) explain why we still need to check dma assuming we had
vring_need_unmap_buffer():

If vring_need_unmap_buffer() is true, we don't need to care about dma at all.

If vring_need_unmap_buffer() is false, we must return dma info
otherwise there's a leak?

> + *
> + * Return:
> + * true: the virtio core must unmap the desc
> + * false: the virtio core skip the desc unmap

Might it be better to say "It's up to the driver to unmap"?

> + */
> +static bool vring_need_unmap(struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
> +                            struct virtio_dma_head *dma,
> +                            dma_addr_t addr, unsigned int length)
> +{
> +       if (vq->do_unmap)
> +               return true;
> +
> +       if (!vq->premapped)
> +               return false;
> +
> +       if (!dma)
> +               return false;

So the logic here is odd.

if (!dma)
        return false;
...
        return false;

A strong hint to split the below getting info logic into another
helper. The root cause is the function do more than just a "yes or
no".

> +
> +       if (unlikely(dma->next >= dma->num)) {
> +               BAD_RING(vq, "premapped vq: collect dma overflow: %pad %u\n",
> +                        &addr, length);
> +               return false;
> +       }
> +
> +       dma->items[dma->next].addr = addr;
> +       dma->items[dma->next].length = length;
> +
> +       ++dma->next;
> +
> +       return false;
> +}
> +

Thanks

....