[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3d2d5f4e-c554-4648-bcec-839d83585123@linux.dev>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 17:10:36 -0800
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
To: Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@...a.com>,
Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, Victor Stewart <v@...etag.social>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v8 1/3] bpf: make common crypto API for TC/XDP
programs
On 1/15/24 2:08 PM, Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
> +static int bpf_crypto_crypt(const struct bpf_crypto_ctx *ctx,
> + const struct bpf_dynptr_kern *src,
> + struct bpf_dynptr_kern *dst,
> + const struct bpf_dynptr_kern *siv,
> + bool decrypt)
> +{
> + u32 src_len, dst_len, siv_len;
> + const u8 *psrc;
> + u8 *pdst, *piv;
> + int err;
> +
> + if (ctx->type->get_flags(ctx->tfm) & CRYPTO_TFM_NEED_KEY)
nit. Does the indirect call get_flags() return different values?
Should it be rejected earlier, e.g. in bpf_crypto_ctx_create()?
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (__bpf_dynptr_is_rdonly(dst))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + siv_len = __bpf_dynptr_size(siv);
> + src_len = __bpf_dynptr_size(src);
> + dst_len = __bpf_dynptr_size(dst);
> + if (!src_len || !dst_len)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (siv_len != (ctx->type->ivsize(ctx->tfm) + ctx->type->statesize(ctx->tfm)))
Same here, two indirect calls per en/decrypt kfunc call. Does the return value
change?
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + psrc = __bpf_dynptr_data(src, src_len);
> + if (!psrc)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + pdst = __bpf_dynptr_data_rw(dst, dst_len);
> + if (!pdst)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + piv = siv_len ? __bpf_dynptr_data_rw(siv, siv_len) : NULL;
> + if (siv_len && !piv)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + err = decrypt ? ctx->type->decrypt(ctx->tfm, psrc, pdst, src_len, piv)
> + : ctx->type->encrypt(ctx->tfm, psrc, pdst, src_len, piv);
> +
> + return err;
> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists