[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACKFLikMtipC_aJZcRztsv5wixsK4sFXo=_5N--_RkOupgoSxA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 09:58:15 -0800
From: Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>, Pavan Chebbi <pavan.chebbi@...adcom.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>, gospo@...adcom.com,
"open list:BROADCOM BNXT_EN 50 GIGABIT ETHERNET DRIVER" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bnxt_en: Make PTP timestamp HWRM more silent
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 9:44 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 20:51:25 +0530 Pavan Chebbi wrote:
> > > > LGTM, however, you may still need to add a proper fixes tag.
> > >
> > > Thanks. I didn't include a fix tag because it is not a fix per se, but,
> > > I can easily send a v2 if this is needed.
>
> We should pick it as a fix. If we put it in net-next and someone
> complains cherry-picking it into net would be a PITA. And we shouldn't
> spew WARN()s about known-to-be-occurring conditions, GregKH is pretty
> clear about that.
>
> If you can post the Fixes tag in a reply our apply scripts should pick
> it up automatically. Or at least mine will :)
Fixes: 056bce63c469 ("bnxt_en: Make PTP TX timestamp HWRM query silent")
Reviewed-by: Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (4209 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists