[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f7til3g130y.fsf@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 11:18:53 -0500
From: Aaron Conole <aconole@...hat.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Shuah
Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>, Florian
Westphal <fw@...len.de>, Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] selftests: net: add missing config for big tcp tests
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> writes:
> The big_tcp test-case requires a few kernel knobs currently
> not specified in the net selftests config, causing the
> following failure:
>
> # selftests: net: big_tcp.sh
> # Error: Failed to load TC action module.
> # We have an error talking to the kernel
> ...
> # Testing for BIG TCP:
> # CLI GSO | GW GRO | GW GSO | SER GRO
> # ./big_tcp.sh: line 107: test: !=: unary operator expected
> ...
> # on on on on : [FAIL_on_link1]
>
> Add the missing configs
>
> Fixes: 6bb382bcf742 ("selftests: add a selftest for big tcp")
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
> ---
Thanks for the fix.
Maybe we should also add the config for NET_ACT_CT since we will
invoke it on setup. I guess there's some dependency that must be
pulling it in for us already so we don't explicitly call for it, but we
do require it in setup() if I understand correctly. I don't think it
should hold up this patch though.
Acked-by: Aaron Conole <aconole@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists