| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20240126000721.GB1987@fastly.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 16:07:21 -0800
From: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
chuck.lever@...cle.com, jlayton@...nel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, brauner@...nel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
davem@...emloft.net, alexander.duyck@...il.com,
sridhar.samudrala@...el.com, kuba@...nel.org,
willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com, weiwan@...gle.com,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Nathan Lynch <nathanl@...ux.ibm.com>,
Steve French <stfrench@...rosoft.com>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Julien Panis <jpanis@...libre.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andrew Waterman <waterman@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:FILESYSTEMS (VFS and infrastructure)" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 3/3] eventpoll: Add epoll ioctl for
epoll_params
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 03:22:34PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 10:56:59PM +0000, Joe Damato wrote:
> > Add an ioctl for getting and setting epoll_params. User programs can use
> > this ioctl to get and set the busy poll usec time or packet budget
> > params for a specific epoll context.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>
> > ---
> > .../userspace-api/ioctl/ioctl-number.rst | 1 +
> > fs/eventpoll.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++
> > include/uapi/linux/eventpoll.h | 12 ++++
> > 3 files changed, 77 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/ioctl/ioctl-number.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/ioctl/ioctl-number.rst
> > index 457e16f06e04..b33918232f78 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/userspace-api/ioctl/ioctl-number.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/ioctl/ioctl-number.rst
> > @@ -309,6 +309,7 @@ Code Seq# Include File Comments
> > 0x89 0B-DF linux/sockios.h
> > 0x89 E0-EF linux/sockios.h SIOCPROTOPRIVATE range
> > 0x89 F0-FF linux/sockios.h SIOCDEVPRIVATE range
> > +0x8A 00-1F linux/eventpoll.h
> > 0x8B all linux/wireless.h
> > 0x8C 00-3F WiNRADiO driver
> > <http://www.winradio.com.au/>
> > diff --git a/fs/eventpoll.c b/fs/eventpoll.c
> > index 40bd97477b91..73ae886efb8a 100644
> > --- a/fs/eventpoll.c
> > +++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
> > @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@
> > * Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
> > */
> >
> > +#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
> > +
> > #include <linux/init.h>
> > #include <linux/kernel.h>
> > #include <linux/sched/signal.h>
> > @@ -37,6 +39,7 @@
> > #include <linux/seq_file.h>
> > #include <linux/compat.h>
> > #include <linux/rculist.h>
> > +#include <linux/capability.h>
> > #include <net/busy_poll.h>
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -495,6 +498,39 @@ static inline void ep_set_busy_poll_napi_id(struct epitem *epi)
> > ep->napi_id = napi_id;
> > }
> >
> > +static long ep_eventpoll_bp_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
> > + unsigned long arg)
> > +{
> > + struct eventpoll *ep;
> > + struct epoll_params epoll_params;
> > + void __user *uarg = (void __user *) arg;
> > +
> > + ep = file->private_data;
> > +
> > + switch (cmd) {
> > + case EPIOCSPARAMS:
> > + if (copy_from_user(&epoll_params, uarg, sizeof(epoll_params)))
> > + return -EFAULT;
> > +
> > + if (epoll_params.busy_poll_budget > NAPI_POLL_WEIGHT &&
> > + !capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN))
> > + return -EPERM;
> > +
> > + ep->busy_poll_usecs = epoll_params.busy_poll_usecs;
> > + ep->busy_poll_budget = epoll_params.busy_poll_budget;
> > + return 0;
> > + case EPIOCGPARAMS:
> > + memset(&epoll_params, 0, sizeof(epoll_params));
> > + epoll_params.busy_poll_usecs = ep->busy_poll_usecs;
> > + epoll_params.busy_poll_budget = ep->busy_poll_budget;
> > + if (copy_to_user(uarg, &epoll_params, sizeof(epoll_params)))
> > + return -EFAULT;
> > + return 0;
> > + default:
> > + return -ENOIOCTLCMD;
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > #else
> >
> > static inline bool ep_busy_loop(struct eventpoll *ep, int nonblock)
> > @@ -510,6 +546,12 @@ static inline bool ep_busy_loop_on(struct eventpoll *ep)
> > {
> > return false;
> > }
> > +
> > +static long ep_eventpoll_bp_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
> > + unsigned long arg)
> > +{
> > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +}
> > #endif /* CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL */
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -869,6 +911,26 @@ static void ep_clear_and_put(struct eventpoll *ep)
> > ep_free(ep);
> > }
> >
> > +static long ep_eventpoll_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + if (!is_file_epoll(file))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + switch (cmd) {
> > + case EPIOCSPARAMS:
> > + case EPIOCGPARAMS:
> > + ret = ep_eventpoll_bp_ioctl(file, cmd, arg);
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int ep_eventpoll_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> > {
> > struct eventpoll *ep = file->private_data;
> > @@ -975,6 +1037,8 @@ static const struct file_operations eventpoll_fops = {
> > .release = ep_eventpoll_release,
> > .poll = ep_eventpoll_poll,
> > .llseek = noop_llseek,
> > + .unlocked_ioctl = ep_eventpoll_ioctl,
> > + .compat_ioctl = compat_ptr_ioctl,
> > };
> >
> > /*
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/eventpoll.h b/include/uapi/linux/eventpoll.h
> > index cfbcc4cc49ac..8eb0fdbce995 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/eventpoll.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/eventpoll.h
> > @@ -85,4 +85,16 @@ struct epoll_event {
> > __u64 data;
> > } EPOLL_PACKED;
> >
> > +struct epoll_params {
> > + u64 busy_poll_usecs;
> > + u16 busy_poll_budget;
> > +
> > + /* for future fields */
> > + u8 data[118];
>
> You forgot to validate that "data" is set to 0, which means that this
> would be useless. Why have this at all?
I included this because I (probably incorrectly) thought that there should
be some extra space in the struct for future additions if needed.
I am not sure if that is a recommended practice for this sort of thing or
not, but if it is I can add some validation.
Thanks for your time and effort in reviewing my code.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists