[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240129145807.8773-6-fw@strlen.de>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 15:57:55 +0100
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
<netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kunwu Chan <chentao@...inos.cn>
Subject: [PATCH nf-next 5/9] netfilter: nf_conncount: Use KMEM_CACHE instead of kmem_cache_create()
From: Kunwu Chan <chentao@...inos.cn>
Use the new KMEM_CACHE() macro instead of direct kmem_cache_create
to simplify the creation of SLAB caches.
Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan <chentao@...inos.cn>
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
---
net/netfilter/nf_conncount.c | 8 ++------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conncount.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conncount.c
index 5d8ed6c90b7e..8715617b02fe 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conncount.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conncount.c
@@ -605,15 +605,11 @@ static int __init nf_conncount_modinit(void)
for (i = 0; i < CONNCOUNT_SLOTS; ++i)
spin_lock_init(&nf_conncount_locks[i]);
- conncount_conn_cachep = kmem_cache_create("nf_conncount_tuple",
- sizeof(struct nf_conncount_tuple),
- 0, 0, NULL);
+ conncount_conn_cachep = KMEM_CACHE(nf_conncount_tuple, 0);
if (!conncount_conn_cachep)
return -ENOMEM;
- conncount_rb_cachep = kmem_cache_create("nf_conncount_rb",
- sizeof(struct nf_conncount_rb),
- 0, 0, NULL);
+ conncount_rb_cachep = KMEM_CACHE(nf_conncount_rb, 0);
if (!conncount_rb_cachep) {
kmem_cache_destroy(conncount_conn_cachep);
return -ENOMEM;
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists