| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20240129-nfsd-fixes-v1-1-49a3a45bd750@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 11:43:15 -0500
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@...app.com>, Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@...cle.com>,
Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@...hat.com>
Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@...app.com>, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Aring <aahringo@...hat.com>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] sunrpc: fix assignment of to_retries in svc_process_bc
Alex reported seeing this:
[ 18.238266] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 18.239286] UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in net/sunrpc/xprt.c:660:14
[ 18.240699] shift exponent 60000 is too large for 64-bit type 'long unsigned int'
[ 18.242277] CPU: 1 PID: 290 Comm: NFSv4 callback Not tainted 6.8.0-rc1devtest5+ #5814
[ 18.243846] Hardware name: Red Hat KVM/RHEL-AV, BIOS 1.16.0-4.module+el8.9.0+19570+14a90618 04/01/2014
[ 18.245460] Call Trace:
[ 18.245855] <TASK>
[ 18.246200] dump_stack_lvl+0x93/0xb0
[ 18.246785] dump_stack+0x10/0x20
[ 18.247308] ubsan_epilogue+0x9/0x40
[ 18.247875] __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x110/0x170
[ 18.248727] ? ktime_get+0x130/0x2a0
[ 18.249317] xprt_calc_majortimeo.isra.13.cold.45+0x12/0x23
[ 18.250184] xprt_init_majortimeo.isra.27+0x9c/0x150
[ 18.251062] xprt_init_bc_request+0xc1/0xd0
[ 18.251728] rpc_run_bc_task+0xd3/0x1b0
[ 18.252328] ? __pfx_rpc_run_bc_task+0x10/0x10
[ 18.253045] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x20
[ 18.253780] ? xdr_inline_decode+0x5b/0x260
[ 18.254447] svc_process_bc+0x3b2/0x4d0
[ 18.255069] ? __pfx_svc_process_bc+0x10/0x10
[ 18.255755] ? __lwq_dequeue+0x5c/0xe0
[ 18.256350] ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
[ 18.257002] ? svc_thread_should_sleep+0x15d/0x190
[ 18.257754] ? svc_recv+0x918/0x13b0
[ 18.258321] svc_recv+0xa7e/0x13b0
[ 18.258892] nfs4_callback_svc+0x53/0xb0
[ 18.259508] ? __pfx_nfs4_callback_svc+0x10/0x10
[ 18.260227] kthread+0x1c2/0x210
[ 18.260744] ? kthread+0x103/0x210
[ 18.261278] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[ 18.261872] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
[ 18.262433] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[ 18.263024] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
[ 18.263684] </TASK>
[ 18.264348] ---[ end trace ]---
to_initval can be very large and cause a shift overflow later. Ensure we
copy the correct value into to_retries.
Cc: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@...hat.com>
Reported-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@...hat.com>
Fixes: 57331a59ac0d NFSv4.1: Use the nfs_client's rpc timeouts for backchannel
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
---
net/sunrpc/svc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc.c b/net/sunrpc/svc.c
index f60c93e5a25d..d86bf5b051fa 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/svc.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/svc.c
@@ -1598,7 +1598,7 @@ void svc_process_bc(struct rpc_rqst *req, struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
/* Finally, send the reply synchronously */
if (rqstp->bc_to_initval > 0) {
timeout.to_initval = rqstp->bc_to_initval;
- timeout.to_retries = rqstp->bc_to_initval;
+ timeout.to_retries = rqstp->bc_to_retries;
} else {
timeout.to_initval = req->rq_xprt->timeout->to_initval;
timeout.to_initval = req->rq_xprt->timeout->to_retries;
---
base-commit: 41bccc98fb7931d63d03f326a746ac4d429c1dd3
change-id: 20240129-nfsd-fixes-0d95718a0bca
Best regards,
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists