netdev - Re: [PATCH net] selftests: net: add missing config for big tcp tests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a090936028c28b480cf3f8a66a9c3d924b7fd6ec.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 10:11:55 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
 Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Xin Long
 <lucien.xin@...il.com>,  Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, Aaron Conole
 <aconole@...hat.com>, Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>,
 linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] selftests: net: add missing config for big tcp tests

On Fri, 2024-01-26 at 11:55 -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 16:32:36 +0100 Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > The big_tcp test-case requires a few kernel knobs currently
> > not specified in the net selftests config, causing the
> > following failure:
> > 
> >   # selftests: net: big_tcp.sh
> >   # Error: Failed to load TC action module.
> >   # We have an error talking to the kernel
> > ...
> >   # Testing for BIG TCP:
> >   # CLI GSO | GW GRO | GW GSO | SER GRO
> >   # ./big_tcp.sh: line 107: test: !=: unary operator expected
> > ...
> >   # on        on       on       on      : [FAIL_on_link1]
> > 
> > Add the missing configs
> > 
> > Fixes: 6bb382bcf742 ("selftests: add a selftest for big tcp")
> > Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
> 
> Ah, great, I was missing RF_RAW in the local hack.
> I applied manually because looks like this change is on top of
> something:
> 
> patching file tools/testing/selftests/net/config
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 73 with fuzz 1 (offset -1 lines).
> Hunk #4 succeeded at 82 (offset -1 lines).

Ooops... yes, indeed it's on top of the few patches I sent in the past
days.

> While at it I reordered the values a little bit to be closer to what 
> I think would get us closer to alphasort. Hope you don't mind.

Sure thing I don't mind! I'm sorry for the extra work on you.

Cheers,

Paolo