netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] dt-bindings: can: mpfs: add missing required clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240130-narrow-lyricism-8b25baac7bb2@wendy>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 12:11:44 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
CC: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, "Daire
 McNamara" <daire.mcnamara@...rochip.com>, Wolfgang Grandegger
	<wg@...ndegger.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
	<edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni
	<pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
	<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Paul Walmsley
	<paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou
	<aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	"Stephen Boyd" <sboyd@...nel.org>, <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] dt-bindings: can: mpfs: add missing required clock

On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 04:31:32PM +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 22.01.2024 14:56:09, Conor Dooley wrote:

> > I think we already had this discussion on v1, where I said that the
> > binding requires the clocks to be in that order, regardless of whether
> > or not clock-names is provided. You feel more strongly about it than I
> > do, so I will add them when I get around to sending a v3.
> 
> Yes, this discussion sounded very familiar to me, never mind. Keep it as
> is, and let's get this binding and the CAN driver upstream!

BTW, I didn't see an ack on this nor do I see it in linux-next (yet).
Are you expecting the patch to go with the rest via the clock tree,
via the DT tree or will you be taking it with CAN stuff via netdev?

I can resend this one patch with a netdev appropriate subject prefix
if you like.

Thanks,
Conor.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)