[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240130124659.670321-1-pulehui@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 12:46:57 +0000
From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@...weicloud.com>
To: bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>,
Hou Tao <houtao1@...wei.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@...il.com>,
Pu Lehui <pulehui@...wei.com>,
Pu Lehui <pulehui@...weicloud.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] Enable inline bpf_kptr_xchg() for RV64
This patch is the RV64 implementation of inline bpf_kptr_xchg()[0]. RV64
JIT supports 64-bit BPF_XCHG atomic instructions. At the same time, the
underlying implementation of xchg() and atomic64_xchg() in RV64 both are
raw_xchg() that supported 64-bit. Therefore inline bpf_kptr_xchg() will
have equivalent semantics. Let's inline it for better performance.
link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240105104819.3916743-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com [0]
Pu Lehui (2):
riscv, bpf: Enable inline bpf_kptr_xchg() for RV64
selftests/bpf: Enable inline bpf_kptr_xchg() test for RV64
arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 5 +++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kptr_xchg_inline.c | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists