[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240130131137.GH351311@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 13:11:37 +0000
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Jedrzej Jagielski <jedrzej.jagielski@...el.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next v4 3/3] ixgbe: Clarify the values of the
returning status
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 02:05:03PM +0100, Jedrzej Jagielski wrote:
> Converting s32 functions to regular int in the previous patch of the series
> caused triggering smatch warnings about missing error code.
>
> New smatch warnings:
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_x550.c:2884 ixgbe_get_lcd_t_x550em() warn: missing error code? 'status'
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_x550.c:3130 ixgbe_enter_lplu_t_x550em() warn: missing error code? 'status'
>
> Old smatch warnings:
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_x550.c:2890 ixgbe_get_lcd_t_x550em() warn: missing error code? 'status'
>
> Fix it by clearly stating returning error code as 0.
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202401041701.6QKTsZmx-lkp@intel.com/
> Signed-off-by: Jedrzej Jagielski <jedrzej.jagielski@...el.com>
Thanks, nice to see this cleaned up.
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists