netdev - Re: [PATCH v6 net-next 1/5] net: add generic per-cpu page

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZbkHDo4bxcWtGP9X@lore-desk>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 15:26:22 +0100
From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com>
To: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
	pabeni@...hat.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org, toke@...hat.com,
	willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com, jasowang@...hat.com,
	sdf@...gle.com, hawk@...nel.org, ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 net-next 1/5] net: add generic per-cpu page_pool
 allocator

> On 2024/1/29 21:04, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> >> On 2024/1/28 22:20, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> >>
> >>>  #ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
> >>>  /*
> >>>   * register_netdevice() inits txq->_xmit_lock and sets lockdep class
> >>> @@ -11686,6 +11690,27 @@ static void __init net_dev_struct_check(void)
> >>>   *
> >>>   */
> >>>  
> >>> +#define SD_PAGE_POOL_RING_SIZE	256
> >>
> >> I might missed that if there is a reason we choose 256 here, do we
> >> need to use different value for differe page size, for 64K page size,
> >> it means we might need to reserve 16MB memory for each CPU.
> > 
> > honestly I have not spent time on it, most of the current page_pool users set
> > pool_size to 256. Anyway, do you mean something like:
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> > index f70fb6cad2b2..3934a3fc5c45 100644
> > --- a/net/core/dev.c
> > +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> > @@ -11806,12 +11806,11 @@ static void __init net_dev_struct_check(void)
> >   *
> >   */
> >  
> > -#define SD_PAGE_POOL_RING_SIZE	256
> >  static int net_page_pool_alloc(int cpuid)
> >  {
> >  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PAGE_POOL)
> 
> Isn't better to have a config like CONFIG_PER_CPU_PAGE_POOL to enable
> this feature? and this config can be selected by whoever needs this
> feature?

since it will be used for generic xdp (at least) I think this will be 99%
enabled when we have bpf enabled, right?

> 
> >  	struct page_pool_params page_pool_params = {
> > -		.pool_size = SD_PAGE_POOL_RING_SIZE,
> > +		.pool_size = PAGE_SIZE < SZ_64K ? 256 : 16,
> 
> What about other page size? like 16KB?
> How about something like below:
> PAGE_SIZE << get_order(PER_CPU_PAGE_POOL_MAX_SIZE)

since pool_size is the number of elements in the ptr_ring associated to the pool,
assuming we want to consume PER_CPU_PAGE_POOL_MAX_SIZE for each cpu, something
like:

PER_CPU_PAGE_POOL_MAX_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE

Regards,
Lorenzo

> 
> >  		.nid = NUMA_NO_NODE,
> >  	};
> >  	struct page_pool *pp_ptr;
> 

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)