netdev - Re: [syzbot] [net?] [v9fs?] WARNING: refcount bug in p9_req

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANp29Y65E_jqfhkipGzJQ5DuDhpZzLrNJmL=foAgk9cgD8L5tw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 17:41:12 +0100
From: Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh@...gle.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, 
	syzbot <syzbot+d99d2414db66171fccbb@...kaller.appspotmail.com>, 
	asmadeus@...ewreck.org, ericvh@...nel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux_oss@...debyte.com, lucho@...kov.net, 
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, v9fs@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [net?] [v9fs?] WARNING: refcount bug in p9_req_put (3)

[resending the same reply in plaintext]

Hi!

Thanks for reminding me. I've just regenerated the list of
classification rules based on the latest linux-next[1], syzbot will
reclassify all findings once the PR is merged.

[1] https://github.com/google/syzkaller/pull/4471

-- 
Aleksandr


On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 11:23 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 01:05:28 -0800 syzbot wrote:
> > HEAD commit:    4fbbed787267 Merge tag 'timers-core-2024-01-21' of git://g..
> > git tree:       upstream
> > console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=11bfbdc7e80000
> > kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=4059ab9bf06b6ceb
> > dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d99d2414db66171fccbb
> > compiler:       gcc (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
> > userspace arch: i386
>
> Hi Aleksandr,
>
> we did add a X: net/9p entry to MAINTAINERS back in November [1]
> but looks like 9p still gets counted as networking. Is it going
> to peter out over time or something's not parsing things right?
>
> [1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/CANp29Y77rtNrUgQA9HKcB3=bt8FrhbqUSnbZJi3_OGmTpSda6A@mail.gmail.com/