| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 15:16:23 +0100 From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com> To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "netdev-driver-reviewers@...r.kernel.org" <netdev-driver-reviewers@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [ANN] net-next is OPEN On 31.01.2024 14:23, Ido Schimmel wrote: > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 09:18:10AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: >> On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 19:00:49 +0200 Ido Schimmel wrote: >>>> Installed both (from source) just in time for the >>>> net-next-2024-01-29--15-00 run.. let's see. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> The last two tests look good now, but the first still fails. Can you >>> share the ndisc6 version information? I tested with [1] from [2]. >>> >>> If your copy of ndisc6 indeed works, then I might be missing some >>> sysctl. I will be AFK tomorrow so I will look into it later this week. >> >> Hm. Looks like our versions match. I put the entire tools root dir up on >> HTTP now: https://netdev-2.bots.linux.dev/tools/fs/ in case you wanna >> fetch the exact binary, it only links with libc, it seems. > > I tried with your binary and on other setups and I'm unable to reproduce > the failure. From the test output it seems the NS is never sent. If you > can, attaching the verbose test output might help: > > ./test_bridge_neigh_suppress.sh -t neigh_suppress_ns -v > > Thanks > Maybe change the subject of the mail thread? At least I'm confused if I read several times a day "net-next is OPEN".
Powered by blists - more mailing lists