[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2b69548a-79c4-42ca-8202-664696164488@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 15:16:23 +0100
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev-driver-reviewers@...r.kernel.org"
<netdev-driver-reviewers@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ANN] net-next is OPEN
On 31.01.2024 14:23, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 09:18:10AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 19:00:49 +0200 Ido Schimmel wrote:
>>>> Installed both (from source) just in time for the
>>>> net-next-2024-01-29--15-00 run.. let's see.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> The last two tests look good now, but the first still fails. Can you
>>> share the ndisc6 version information? I tested with [1] from [2].
>>>
>>> If your copy of ndisc6 indeed works, then I might be missing some
>>> sysctl. I will be AFK tomorrow so I will look into it later this week.
>>
>> Hm. Looks like our versions match. I put the entire tools root dir up on
>> HTTP now: https://netdev-2.bots.linux.dev/tools/fs/ in case you wanna
>> fetch the exact binary, it only links with libc, it seems.
>
> I tried with your binary and on other setups and I'm unable to reproduce
> the failure. From the test output it seems the NS is never sent. If you
> can, attaching the verbose test output might help:
>
> ./test_bridge_neigh_suppress.sh -t neigh_suppress_ns -v
>
> Thanks
>
Maybe change the subject of the mail thread? At least I'm confused if I
read several times a day "net-next is OPEN".
Powered by blists - more mailing lists