netdev - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: can: fsl,flexcan: add i.MX95 compatible string

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240131145736.GA1262278-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 08:57:36 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
	"Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>,
	"wg@...ndegger.com" <wg@...ndegger.com>,
	"conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	"linux-can@...r.kernel.org" <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: can: fsl,flexcan: add i.MX95 compatible
 string

On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 07:00:27AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: can: fsl,flexcan: add i.MX95 compatible
> > string
> > 
> > On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 11:26:25 +0100 Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> > > > Add i.MX95 flexcan which is compatible i.MX93 flexcan
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
> > 
> > Hm, you don't apply CAN DTB patches?
> 
> Nope. I am preparing dt-binding first, then post the i.MX95 SoC
> dtsi. The CAN will be in the i.MX95 SOC dtsi file, not a
> single patch only for CAN node.

The question was why isn't Marc, the CAN maintainer, applying this. I 
have the same question.

Rob