[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240201163149.0d02fe46@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 16:31:49 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Linux
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: runtime warnings after merge of the bpf-next tree
Hi all,
On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 20:02:28 -0800 Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 7:55 PM Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz> wrote:
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/btf_ids.h b/include/linux/btf_ids.h
> > index 0fe4f1cd1918..e24aabfe8ecc 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/btf_ids.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/btf_ids.h
> > @@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ BTF_SET8_END(name)
> > #define BTF_SET_END(name)
> > #define BTF_SET8_START(name) static struct btf_id_set8 __maybe_unused name = { 0 };
> > #define BTF_SET8_END(name)
> > -#define BTF_KFUNCS_START(name) static struct btf_id_set8 __maybe_unused name = { 0 };
> > +#define BTF_KFUNCS_START(name) static struct btf_id_set8 __maybe_unused name = { .flags = BTF_SET8_KFUNCS };
> > #define BTF_KFUNCS_END(name)
>
> Most likely you're correct.
> Force pushed bpf-next with this fix.
That fixed it for me, thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists