netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/4] Mixing bpf2bpf and tailcalls for RV64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1c0c1ede-8595-4420-9f70-004645895a71@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 17:46:27 +0800
From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@...weicloud.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
 Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc: bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
 Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
 Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Martin KaFai Lau
 <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>,
 Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
 John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
 Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
 Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
 Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@...il.com>, Pu Lehui <pulehui@...wei.com>,
 Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/4] Mixing bpf2bpf and tailcalls for RV64



On 2024/2/2 0:19, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 2:56 AM Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net> wrote:
>>
>>> will be destroyed. So we implemented mixing bpf2bpf and tailcalls
>>> similar to x86_64, i.e. using a non-callee saved register to transfer
> ...
>> Iiuc, this still needs a respin as per the ongoing discussions. Also,
>> if you have worked on BPF selftests which exercise the corner case
>> around a6, please include them in the series as well for coverage.
> 
> Hold on, folks.
> I'm not sure it's such a code idea to support tailcalls from subprogs
> in risc-v.
> They're broken on x86-64 and so far several attempts to fix them
> were not successful.
> If we don't have a fix soon we will disable this feature completely
> in the verifier.
> In general tailcalling from subprogs is a niche use case.
> If there are users they should transition to tail call from main prog only.
> 
> See
> https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAADnVQJ1szry9P00wweVDu4d0AQoM_49qT-_ueirvggAiCZrpw@mail.gmail.com/

OK, will keep tracking.