lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240202183259.33859154@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 18:32:59 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@...il.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, Linux List Kernel Mailing
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
 Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: This is the fourth time I’ve tried to find what
 led to the regression of outgoing network speed and each time I find the
 merge commit 8c94ccc7cd691472461448f98e2372c75849406c

Thanks for the forward!

On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 17:16:41 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> When I copy files from one computer to another and kernel snapshot
> >> builded from commit 296455ade1fd I have 97-110MB/sec which is almost
> >> max speed of 1Gbps link.
> >> When I move to commit 9d1694dc91ce I have only 66-70MB/sec which is
> >> significantly slower.

There isn't that much networking in between the two.
Is any of the CPU cores at 100% when you are transferring the data on
the bad commit?
Do you have any iptables / nftables rules?
Are you using TLS in the transfer?
Did you try reverting f1172f3ee3a98754?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ