netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] net: wan: fsl_qmc_hdlc: Add runtime timeslots changes support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240205160033.2c017f46@bootlin.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 16:00:33 +0100
From: Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: Vadim Fedorenko  <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>, "David S. Miller"
 <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski
 <kuba@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Mark Brown
 <broonie@...nel.org>, Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
 Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] net: wan: fsl_qmc_hdlc: Add runtime timeslots
 changes support

Hi Paolo,

On Thu, 01 Feb 2024 13:01:51 +0100
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> wrote:

[...]
> >  
> > +static int qmc_hdlc_xlate_slot_map(struct qmc_hdlc *qmc_hdlc,
> > +				   u32 slot_map, struct qmc_chan_ts_info *ts_info)
> > +{
> > +	DECLARE_BITMAP(ts_mask_avail, 64);
> > +	DECLARE_BITMAP(ts_mask, 64);
> > +	DECLARE_BITMAP(map, 64);
> > +	u32 array32[2];
> > +
> > +	/* Tx and Rx available masks must be identical */
> > +	if (ts_info->rx_ts_mask_avail != ts_info->tx_ts_mask_avail) {
> > +		dev_err(qmc_hdlc->dev, "tx and rx available timeslots mismatch (0x%llx, 0x%llx)\n",
> > +			ts_info->rx_ts_mask_avail, ts_info->tx_ts_mask_avail);
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	bitmap_from_arr64(ts_mask_avail, &ts_info->rx_ts_mask_avail, 64);
> > +	array32[0] = slot_map;
> > +	array32[1] = 0;
> > +	bitmap_from_arr32(map, array32, 64);  
> 
> What about using bitmap_from_u64 everywhere ?

Yes indeed.
Will be updated in the next series iteration.

Thanks for this review.
Best regards,
Hervé