[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1707108293-1004-1-git-send-email-ajay.kaher@broadcom.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 10:14:52 +0530
From: Ajay Kaher <ajay.kaher@...adcom.com>
To: stable@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: pablo@...filter.org,
kadlec@...filter.org,
fw@...len.de,
davem@...emloft.net,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
coreteam@...filter.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
alexey.makhalov@...adcom.com,
florian.fainelli@...adcom.com,
vasavi.sirnapalli@...adcom.com,
Ajay Kaher <ajay.kaher@...adcom.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4.19.y] netfilter: nf_tables: fix pointer math issue in nft_byteorder_eval()
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
commit c301f0981fdd3fd1ffac6836b423c4d7a8e0eb63 upstream.
The problem is in nft_byteorder_eval() where we are iterating through a
loop and writing to dst[0], dst[1], dst[2] and so on... On each
iteration we are writing 8 bytes. But dst[] is an array of u32 so each
element only has space for 4 bytes. That means that every iteration
overwrites part of the previous element.
I spotted this bug while reviewing commit caf3ef7468f7 ("netfilter:
nf_tables: prevent OOB access in nft_byteorder_eval") which is a related
issue. I think that the reason we have not detected this bug in testing
is that most of time we only write one element.
Fixes: ce1e7989d989 ("netfilter: nft_byteorder: provide 64bit le/be conversion")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
[Ajay: Modified to apply on v4.19.y]
Signed-off-by: Ajay Kaher <ajay.kaher@...adcom.com>
---
net/netfilter/nft_byteorder.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_byteorder.c b/net/netfilter/nft_byteorder.c
index dba1612..8c4ee49 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nft_byteorder.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nft_byteorder.c
@@ -41,19 +41,20 @@ static void nft_byteorder_eval(const struct nft_expr *expr,
switch (priv->size) {
case 8: {
+ u64 *dst64 = (void *)dst;
u64 src64;
switch (priv->op) {
case NFT_BYTEORDER_NTOH:
for (i = 0; i < priv->len / 8; i++) {
src64 = get_unaligned((u64 *)&src[i]);
- put_unaligned_be64(src64, &dst[i]);
+ put_unaligned_be64(src64, &dst64[i]);
}
break;
case NFT_BYTEORDER_HTON:
for (i = 0; i < priv->len / 8; i++) {
src64 = get_unaligned_be64(&src[i]);
- put_unaligned(src64, (u64 *)&dst[i]);
+ put_unaligned(src64, &dst64[i]);
}
break;
}
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists