netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 4/5] net/ipv6: set expires in modify_prefix_route() if RTF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 10:59:55 -0800
From: Kui-Feng Lee <sinquersw@...il.com>
To: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Cc: thinker.li@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org,
 martin.lau@...ux.dev, kernel-team@...a.com, davem@...emloft.net,
 dsahern@...nel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
 kuifeng@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 4/5] net/ipv6: set expires in
 modify_prefix_route() if RTF_EXPIRES is set.

On 2/4/24 02:17, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 09:57:46AM -0800, Kui-Feng Lee wrote:
>>> Hi Kui-Feng,
>>>
>>> I may missed something. But I still could not get why we shouldn't use
>>> expires for checking? If expires == 0, but RTF_EXPIRES is on,
>>> shouldn't we call fib6_clean_expires()?
>>
>>
>> The case that expires == 0 and RTF_EXPIES is on never happens since
>> inet6_addr_modify() rejects valid_lft == 0 at the beginning. This
>> patch doesn't make difference logically, but make inet6_addr_modify()
>> and modify_prefix_route() consistent.
>>
>> Does that make sense to you?
> 
> Thanks, this does make sense to me. If there will be a new version. It would
> be good to add the following sentence in the description.
> 
> """
> This patch doesn't make difference logically, but make inet6_addr_modify()
> and modify_prefix_route() consistent.
> """
> 

Sure, I will add it to the commit message.

> Reviewed-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
> 
> Regards
> Hangbin