netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: mediatek,xfi-tphy: add new bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d6f787e6-a243-410f-ac6e-c57ea5309838@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 09:08:00 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Chunfeng Yun (云春峰) <Chunfeng.Yun@...iatek.com>,
 "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 SkyLake Huang (黃啟澤)
 <SkyLake.Huang@...iatek.com>, "kishon@...nel.org" <kishon@...nel.org>,
 "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
 "john@...ozen.org" <john@...ozen.org>,
 "p.zabel@...gutronix.de" <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
 "conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
 Bc-bocun Chen (陳柏村)
 <bc-bocun.chen@...iatek.com>,
 "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
 <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
 Steven Liu (劉人豪) <steven.liu@...iatek.com>,
 "vkoul@...nel.org" <vkoul@...nel.org>,
 "matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
 "krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 "daniel@...rotopia.org" <daniel@...rotopia.org>,
 "linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>,
 "dqfext@...il.com" <dqfext@...il.com>,
 "angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com"
 <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: mediatek,xfi-tphy: add new bindings

On 04/02/2024 07:17, Chunfeng Yun (云春峰) wrote:
> On Fri, 2024-02-02 at 09:21 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>  	 
>> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
>> you have verified the sender or the content.
>>  On 01/02/2024 22:52, Daniel Golle wrote:
>>> Add bindings for the MediaTek XFI T-PHY Ethernet SerDes PHY found
>> in the
>>> MediaTek MT7988 SoC which can operate at various interfaces modes:
>>>
>>> via USXGMII PCS:
>>>  * USXGMII
>>>  * 10GBase-R
>>>  * 5GBase-R
>>>
>>> via LynxI SGMII PCS:
>>>  * 2500Base-X
>>>  * 1000Base-X
>>>  * Cisco SGMII (MAC side)
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
>>> ---
>>>  .../bindings/phy/mediatek,xfi-tphy.yaml       | 80
>> +++++++++++++++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 80 insertions(+)
>>>  create mode 100644
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/mediatek,xfi-tphy.yaml
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/mediatek,xfi-
>> tphy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/mediatek,xfi-
>> tphy.yaml
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000000000..e897118dcf7e6
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/mediatek,xfi-tphy.yaml
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>>> +%YAML 1.2
>>> +---
>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/mediatek,xfi-tphy.yaml#
>>
>> Please use compatible as filename. Your binding says only one is
>> possible (const, not enum), so there is no reasoning for different
>> filename.
>>
>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>> +
>>> +title: MediaTek XFI T-PHY
>>> +
>>> +maintainers:
>>> +  - Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
>>> +
>>> +description:
>>> +  The MediaTek XFI SerDes T-PHY provides the physical SerDes lanes
>>> +  used by the (10G/5G) USXGMII PCS and (1G/2.5G) LynxI PCS found
>> in
>>> +  MediaTek's 10G-capabale SoCs.
>>> +
>>> +properties:
>>> +  $nodename:
>>> +    pattern: "^phy@[0-9a-f]+$"
>>
>> No need for nodename in individual bindings file.
>>
>>> +
>>> +  compatible:
>>> +    const: mediatek,mt7988-xfi-tphy
> Add a generic compatible "mediatek,xfi-tphy"?
> 
> Other socs also use this phy but not upstream.

Are they here? No... They will use this one as fallback. Stop insisting
on some generic fallbacks just because you do not like using other SoCs
as fallbacks.

You ignored other comments, so I understand you agree with them 100%.

Best regards,
Krzysztof