netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v5] virtio_net: Support RX hash XDP hint

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5297dad6499f6d00f7229e8cf2c08e0eacb67e0c.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2024 11:43:58 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@...il.com>, Jesper Dangaard Brouer
	 <hawk@...nel.org>
Cc: mst@...hat.com, jasowang@...hat.com, xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com, 
 hengqi@...ux.alibaba.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, 
 kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, 
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
 john.fastabend@...il.com,  daniel@...earbox.net, ast@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5] virtio_net: Support RX hash XDP hint

On Sat, 2024-02-03 at 10:56 +0800, Liang Chen wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 12:20 AM Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On 02/02/2024 13.11, Liang Chen wrote:
[...]
> > > @@ -1033,6 +1039,16 @@ static void put_xdp_frags(struct xdp_buff *xdp)
> > >       }
> > >   }
> > > 
> > > +static void virtnet_xdp_save_rx_hash(struct virtnet_xdp_buff *virtnet_xdp,
> > > +                                  struct net_device *dev,
> > > +                                  struct virtio_net_hdr_v1_hash *hdr_hash)
> > > +{
> > > +     if (dev->features & NETIF_F_RXHASH) {
> > > +             virtnet_xdp->hash_value = hdr_hash->hash_value;
> > > +             virtnet_xdp->hash_report = hdr_hash->hash_report;
> > > +     }
> > > +}
> > > +
> > 
> > Would it be possible to store a pointer to hdr_hash in virtnet_xdp_buff,
> > with the purpose of delaying extracting this, until and only if XDP
> > bpf_prog calls the kfunc?
> > 
> 
> That seems to be the way v1 works,
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240122102256.261374-1-liangchen.linux@gmail.com/
> . But it was pointed out that the inline header may be overwritten by
> the xdp prog, so the hash is copied out to maintain its integrity.

Why? isn't XDP supposed to get write access only to the pkt
contents/buffer?

if the XDP program can really change the virtio_net_hdr, that looks
potentially dangerous/bug prone regardless of this patch.

Thanks,

Paolo