netdev - [PATCH net v2] lan966x: Fix crash when adding interface under a lag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240206123054.3052966-1-horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 13:30:54 +0100
From: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
To: <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
	<pabeni@...hat.com>, <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Horatiu Vultur
	<horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>, Michal Swiatkowski
	<michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH net v2] lan966x: Fix crash when adding interface under a lag

There is a crash when adding one of the lan966x interfaces under a lag
interface. The issue can be reproduced like this:
ip link add name bond0 type bond miimon 100 mode balance-xor
ip link set dev eth0 master bond0

The reason is because when adding a interface under the lag it would go
through all the ports and try to figure out which other ports are under
that lag interface. And the issue is that lan966x can have ports that are
NULL pointer as they are not probed. So then iterating over these ports
it would just crash as they are NULL pointers.
The fix consists in actually checking for NULL pointers before accessing
something from the ports. Like we do in other places.

Fixes: cabc9d49333d ("net: lan966x: Add lag support for lan966x")
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>
---
v1->v2:
- replace lan966x->ports[lag]->bond with port->bond as it is the same
  and easier to follow
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_lag.c | 9 +++++++--
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_lag.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_lag.c
index 41fa2523d91d3..5f2cd9a8cf8fb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_lag.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_lag.c
@@ -37,19 +37,24 @@ static void lan966x_lag_set_aggr_pgids(struct lan966x *lan966x)
 
 	/* Now, set PGIDs for each active LAG */
 	for (lag = 0; lag < lan966x->num_phys_ports; ++lag) {
-		struct net_device *bond = lan966x->ports[lag]->bond;
+		struct lan966x_port *port = lan966x->ports[lag];
 		int num_active_ports = 0;
+		struct net_device *bond;
 		unsigned long bond_mask;
 		u8 aggr_idx[16];
 
-		if (!bond || (visited & BIT(lag)))
+		if (!port || !port->bond || (visited & BIT(lag)))
 			continue;
 
+		bond = port->bond;
 		bond_mask = lan966x_lag_get_mask(lan966x, bond);
 
 		for_each_set_bit(p, &bond_mask, lan966x->num_phys_ports) {
 			struct lan966x_port *port = lan966x->ports[p];
 
+			if (!port)
+				continue;
+
 			lan_wr(ANA_PGID_PGID_SET(bond_mask),
 			       lan966x, ANA_PGID(p));
 			if (port->lag_tx_active)
-- 
2.34.1