netdev - Re: pull request: bluetooth 2024-02-02

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABBYNZJ3bW5wsaX=e7JGhJai_w8YXjCHTnKZVn7x+FNVpn3cXg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 09:45:44 -0500
From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, 
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pull request: bluetooth 2024-02-02

Hi Paolo,

On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 9:33 AM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2024-02-02 at 16:38 -0500, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
> > The following changes since commit ba5e1272142d051dcc57ca1d3225ad8a089f9858:
> >
> >   netdevsim: avoid potential loop in nsim_dev_trap_report_work() (2024-02-02 11:00:38 -0800)
> >
> > are available in the Git repository at:
> >
> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bluetooth/bluetooth.git tags/for-net-2024-02-02
> >
> > for you to fetch changes up to 96d874780bf5b6352e45b4c07c247e37d50263c3:
> >
> >   Bluetooth: qca: Fix triggering coredump implementation (2024-02-02 16:13:56 -0500)
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > bluetooth pull request for net:
>
> A couple of commits have some issue in the tag area (spaces between
> Fixes and other tag):
> >
> >  - btintel: Fix null ptr deref in btintel_read_version
> >  - mgmt: Fix limited discoverable off timeout
> >  - hci_qca: Set BDA quirk bit if fwnode exists in DT
>
> this one ^^^
>
> >  - hci_bcm4377: do not mark valid bd_addr as invalid
> >  - hci_sync: Check the correct flag before starting a scan
> >  - Enforce validation on max value of connection interval
>
> and this one ^^^

Ok, do you use any tools to capture these? checkpatch at least didn't
capture anything for me.

> Would you mind rebasing and resend the PR?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Paolo
>
>


-- 
Luiz Augusto von Dentz