[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240206074151.577d33f1@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 07:41:51 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Shawn Guo <shawnguo2@...h.net>
Cc: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, Rob
Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>, Fabio Estevam
<festevam@...il.com>, NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>, Wei Fang
<wei.fang@....com>, Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@....com>, Clark Wang
<xiaoning.wang@....com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Add 8qm SMMU information
On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 18:50:51 +0800 Shawn Guo wrote:
> > Any preference on whether all these go via a platform tree,
> > or should we pick up the net patch to netdev? I guess taking
> > the DTB via netdev would be the usual way to handle this?
>
> No, it's not. Taking DTS changes through arch/platform tree is the
> usual way.
I said DTB.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists