netdev - Re: [PATCH v4 00/10 iwl-next] idpf: refactor virtchnl messages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 15:17:33 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
Cc: "Brady, Alan" <alan.brady@...el.com>, "intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org"
 <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
 <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com"
 <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>, "Kitszel, Przemyslaw"
 <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>, "Bagnucki, Igor" <igor.bagnucki@...el.com>,
 "Lobakin, Aleksander" <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/10 iwl-next] idpf: refactor virtchnl messages

On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 22:50:25 +0000 Keller, Jacob E wrote:
> > Hm, okay, that does sound like making it worse.
> > I'll disable the minmax coccicheck for now, it seems noisy.  
> 
> Maybe you could make the coccicheck only complain if the value is
> non-zero or not const? Maybe that's a bit too complicated... Hm

Non-zero could work. It may be worthwhile to look at the warnings cocci
currently generates and figure out what's common among the cases where
warning doesn't make sense.