netdev - Re: [PATCH] ieee802154: ca8210: Drop spurious WQ_UNBOUND from alloc_ordered

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 09:59:40 +0100
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com>, Stefan Schmidt
 <stefan@...enfreihafen.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
 Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo
 Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, linux-wpan@...r.kernel.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ieee802154: ca8210: Drop spurious WQ_UNBOUND from
 alloc_ordered_workqueue() call

Hi Tejun,

tj@...nel.org wrote on Mon, 5 Feb 2024 13:53:54 -1000:

> Workqueue is in the process of cleaning up the distinction between unbound
> workqueues w/ @nr_active==1 and ordered workqueues. Explicit WQ_UNBOUND
> isn't needed for alloc_ordered_workqueue() and will trigger a warning in the
> future. Let's remove it. This doesn't cause any functional changes.
> 

Looks okay to me.

Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>

Thanks,
Miquèl