[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240206102503.760ecb64@xps-13>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 10:25:03 +0100
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Alexander Aring <aahringo@...hat.com>
Cc: Bo Liu <liubo03@...pur.com>, alex.aring@...il.com,
stefan@...enfreihafen.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, linux-wpan@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: ieee802154: at86rf230: convert to use maple tree
register cache
Hi,
aahringo@...hat.com wrote on Mon, 5 Feb 2024 14:42:09 -0500:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 2:56 AM Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Bo,
> >
> > liubo03@...pur.com wrote on Fri, 2 Feb 2024 01:45:12 -0500:
> >
> > > The maple tree register cache is based on a much more modern data structure
> > > than the rbtree cache and makes optimisation choices which are probably
> > > more appropriate for modern systems than those made by the rbtree cache.
> >
> > What are the real intended benefits? Shall we expect any drawbacks?
> >
>
> I doubt it has really any benefits, only the slowpath is using regmap
> to set some registers. Maybe if you change phy setting frequently it
> might have an impact, but this isn't even a path considered to run
> fast.
Ok, thanks Alex for the info; in this case I'm fine:
Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Thanks,
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists