[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240207113310.GC1297511@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 11:33:10 +0000
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
Cc: kuba@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, andrew@...n.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 5/9] net: fill in MODULE_DESCRIPTION()s for ipv6
modules
On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 02:19:24AM -0800, Breno Leitao wrote:
> W=1 builds now warn if module is built without a MODULE_DESCRIPTION().
> Add descriptions to the IPv6 modules.
>
> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
...
> index a7bf0327b380..8820bf5b101a 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/ip6_udp_tunnel.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_udp_tunnel.c
> @@ -182,4 +182,5 @@ struct dst_entry *udp_tunnel6_dst_lookup(struct sk_buff *skb,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(udp_tunnel6_dst_lookup);
>
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("IPv6 UDP tunnel driver");
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
Hi Breno,
I don't feel strongly about this,
but looking at NET_UDP_TUNNEL and NET_FOU in net/ipv4/Kconfig, maybe:
IPv6 Foo over UDP tunnel driver
Likewise for the change to net/ipv4/udp_tunnel_core.c
in the following patch.
The above not withstanding, this looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists