netdev - [PATCH net-next] net: cache for same cpu skb_attempt_defer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2b94ee2e65cfd4d2d7f30896ec796f3f9af0a733.1707316651.git.asml.silence@gmail.com>
Date: Wed,  7 Feb 2024 14:41:07 +0000
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	edumazet@...gle.com,
	davem@...emloft.net,
	dsahern@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com,
	kuba@...nel.org
Cc: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] net: cache for same cpu skb_attempt_defer_free

Optimise skb_attempt_defer_free() executed by the CPU the skb was
allocated on. Instead of __kfree_skb() -> kmem_cache_free() we can
disable softirqs and put the buffer into cpu local caches.

Trying it with a TCP CPU bound ping pong benchmark (i.e. netbench), it
showed a 1% throughput improvement (392.2 -> 396.4 Krps). Cross checking
with profiles, the total CPU share of skb_attempt_defer_free() dropped by
0.6%. Note, I'd expect the win doubled with rx only benchmarks, as the
optimisation is for the receive path, but the test spends >55% of CPU
doing writes.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
---
 net/core/skbuff.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index edbbef563d4d..5ac3c353c8a4 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -6877,6 +6877,20 @@ void __skb_ext_put(struct skb_ext *ext)
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__skb_ext_put);
 #endif /* CONFIG_SKB_EXTENSIONS */
 
+static void kfree_skb_napi_cache(struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	/* if SKB is a clone, don't handle this case */
+	if (skb->fclone != SKB_FCLONE_UNAVAILABLE || in_hardirq()) {
+		__kfree_skb(skb);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	local_bh_disable();
+	skb_release_all(skb, SKB_DROP_REASON_NOT_SPECIFIED, false);
+	napi_skb_cache_put(skb);
+	local_bh_enable();
+}
+
 /**
  * skb_attempt_defer_free - queue skb for remote freeing
  * @skb: buffer
@@ -6895,7 +6909,7 @@ void skb_attempt_defer_free(struct sk_buff *skb)
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) ||
 	    !cpu_online(cpu) ||
 	    cpu == raw_smp_processor_id()) {
-nodefer:	__kfree_skb(skb);
+nodefer:	kfree_skb_napi_cache(skb);
 		return;
 	}
 
-- 
2.43.0