netdev - Re: [TEST] The no-kvm CI instances going away

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <13464996-353d-41f5-aaf8-d28a7f988679@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 17:06:44 +0100
From: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@...nel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
 MPTCP Upstream <mptcp@...ts.linux.dev>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 Mat Martineau <martineau@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [TEST] The no-kvm CI instances going away

On 07/02/2024 16:29, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 15:37:22 +0100 Matthieu Baerts wrote:
>>> I'd rather not modify the tree. Poking around - this seems to work:
>>>
>>>   export kselftest_override_timeout=1  
>>
>> Even better :)
>>
>>   f=tools/testing/selftests/net/settings
>>   kselftest_override_timeout=$(awk -F = '/^timeout=/ {print $2*2}' $f)
>>
>>> Now it's just a matter of finding 15min to code it up :)  
>> I'm not sure if I can help here :)
> 
> If you're willing to touch my nasty Python - that'd be very welcome! :)

Sure, I can have a look (but not today) :)

Thank you for the guide! Like with my PR to support subtests, I might
only test the code I modify not to have to set up everything, I hope it
is fine :)

Cheers,
Matt
-- 
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.