[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6ihzd33vbgvixbe54jjoaj27tc5thhaq7u6iaufbmpejrtgxol@jit6qyaxjy3y>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 12:39:34 -0600
From: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com>,
Abhishek Chauhan <quic_abchauha@...cinc.com>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>, Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@...cinc.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, kernel@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v2] net: stmmac: dwmac-qcom-ethqos: Enable TBS on all
queues but 0
On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 10:19:34AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 09:26:05 -0800 Jeff Johnson wrote:
> > > This is similar to the patch raised by NXP <3b12ec8f618e>
> > > <"net: stmmac: dwmac-imx: set TSO/TBS TX queues default settings">
> >
> > note that there is a standard way to refer to a prior patch, in your case:
> > 3b12ec8f618e ("net: stmmac: dwmac-imx: set TSO/TBS TX queues default
> > settings")
>
> Yes, please fix.
>
> > (note this format is defined in the context of the Fixes tag at
> > <https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#using-reported-by-tested-by-reviewed-by-suggested-by-and-fixes>)
>
> A fixes tag would be great. But we can't point at 3b12ec8f618e, right?
> Can someone explain what the user-visible problem is?
> TBS cannot be used? Device reinit is require to enable it?
>
I'm not sure you'd consider this a fix, but yes the syntax there should
be using that fixes style for sure.
This enables the ability to use TBS / etf on queues other than 0. So I'd
consider this a new feature for the Qualcomm variant of things here
personally.
Longer term it would be nice to be able to change which queues can do
what via ethtool as was discussed over here, but for now this at least
improves things and follows suit with the imx and intel variants:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/c2497eef-1041-4cd0-8220-42622c8902f4@quicinc.com/
Thanks,
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists