lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <145e1c28-af2b-4aca-9fd3-f9d7a272516c@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 14:56:33 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: POPESCU Catalin <catalin.popescu@...ca-geosystems.com>
Cc: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
	"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	"conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	"afd@...com" <afd@...com>,
	"hkallweit1@...il.com" <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
	"linux@...linux.org.uk" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	GEO-CHHER-bsp-development <bsp-development.geo@...ca-geosystems.com>,
	"m.felsch@...gutronix.de" <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] net: phy: dp83826: support TX data voltage tuning

> > I could be reading this wrong, but it looks like
> > DP83826_CFG_DAC_MINUS_DEFAULT actually means leave the value
> > unchanged? Is there anything guaranteeing it does in fact have the
> > default value in the hardware?
> >
> >          Andrew
> 
> Yes, the datasheet clearly states the default/reset values of both 
> registers VOD_CFG1 & VOD_CFG2 which are :
> - cfg_dac_minus : 30h
> - cfg_dac_plus : 10h

And the device is actually and always reset by Linux when the driver
loads? Anything the bootloader has done, or a previous kernel, will be
cleared?

Please add this explanation to the commit message.

I'm being pedantic because we have had problems like this in the past.
If a register was not actually set back to the default value, the
bootloader set it to some other value, the board can work fine. Then a
board can came along which the bootloader set the wrong value, and the
default is actually needed. Fixing the driver to actually enforce the
default breaks boards...

	 Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ