netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sfp: add quirk for OEM DFP-34X-2C2 GPON ONU SFP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZcTzMgxmA6WOoiA/@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 15:28:50 +0000
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Sergio Palumbo <palumbo.ser@...look.it>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sfp: add quirk for OEM DFP-34X-2C2 GPON
 ONU SFP

On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 03:00:08PM +0100, Sergio Palumbo wrote:
> Dear Russel,
> this is the first time I do such a test and kindly ask you to help me in
> preparing it.
> In my openwrt environment I have found phylink.c file in two different
> directories:
> /build_dir/toolchain-aarch64_cortex-a53__gcc-112.30_musl/linux-5.15.137/drivers/net/phy
> /build_dir/toolchain-aarch64_cortex-a53__gcc-112.30_musllinux-mediatek_filogic/linux-5.15.137/drivers/net/phy

Oh, openwrt. That means I need to re-understand their build system to
advise how to do it. I only know the mainline kernel.

> do I have to change both adding a line:
> #define DEBUG
> 
> before the first #define line:
> #define SUPPORTED_interfaces \

Mainline has never had "SUPPORTED_interfaces" in phylink.c, so I'm
wondeirng what that's about. I'm also wondering what other changes
there are to it. I'm also wondering whether the behaviour you're
seeing is somehow special to openwrt. Too many things to wonder about
and effectively means there's too much that I don't know.

Therefore, I don't think I can help you, and I don't think I can
possibly accept your proposal for this quirk. For mainline, as far
as I'm aware, it will cause these modules to regress when they are
in the manufacturer default state when used with a host that supports
both 1000base-X and 2500base-X.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!