[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89i+_mFcGJ_zyzM=K-NpPA=hObu-+Cic9L42o+rsdtqEDPw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 18:54:02 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] inet: convert to exit_batch_rtnl
On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 12:16 PM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Even if these four modules exit_batch methods do not unregister
> devices, it is worth converting them to exit_batch_rtnl
> to save rtnl_lock()/rtnl_unlock() pairs in netns dismantles.
>
Please ignore the whole series, more work is needed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists