netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v5 0/5] Remove expired routes with a separated list of routes.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 10:48:08 -0800
From: Kui-Feng Lee <sinquersw@...il.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, thinker.li@...il.com,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev,
 kernel-team@...a.com, davem@...emloft.net, dsahern@...nel.org,
 edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, liuhangbin@...il.com
Cc: kuifeng@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 0/5] Remove expired routes with a separated
 list of routes.

On 2/8/24 03:55, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> Note that we have a selftest failure in the batch including this series
> for the fib_tests:
> 
> https://netdev-3.bots.linux.dev/vmksft-net/results/456022/6-fib-tests-sh/stdout
> 
> I haven't digged much, but I fear its related. Please have a look.
> 
> For more info on how to reproduce the selftest environment:
> 
> https://github.com/linux-netdev/nipa/wiki/How-to-run-netdev-selftests-CI-style
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Paolo
> 

To David and Hangbin,

This specific case failed for the first time and passed on all following
rounds. It is very time sensitive. Do you think it is OK to
run "sysctl -wq net.ipv6.route.flush=1" to force a synchronized gc?