[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <65c567e869ea6_28ece2945c@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch>
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2024 18:46:48 -0500
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] selftests: net: ignore timing errors in
txtimestamp if KSFT_MACHINE_SLOW
Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Feb 2024 15:51:31 -0500 Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > > This test is time sensitive. It may fail on virtual machines and for
> > > debug builds.
> > >
> > > Similar to commit c41dfb0dfbec ("selftests/net: ignore timing errors in
> > > so_txtime if KSFT_MACHINE_SLOW"), optionally suppress failure for timing
> > > errors (only).
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
> >
> > Is this still failing after commit 5264ab612e28
> > ("selftests/net: calibrate txtimestamp")?
>
> On a debug kernel it continues to flake :(
>
> https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/flakes.html?br-cnt=80&tn-needle=txtimestamp&min-flip=0
Thanks. I should have checked the dash directly. Reminder for next time.
Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists