[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <420b3c0a-6321-494b-9181-ff7dd4e1849c@machnikowski.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 22:43:43 +0100
From: Maciek Machnikowski <maciek@...hnikowski.net>
To: David Wei <dw@...idwei.uk>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v9 2/3] netdevsim: forward skbs from one
connected port to another
On 10/02/2024 01:32, David Wei wrote:
> Forward skbs sent from one netdevsim port to its connected netdevsim
> port using dev_forward_skb, in a spirit similar to veth.
>
> Add a tx_dropped variable to struct netdevsim, tracking the number of
> skbs that could not be forwarded using dev_forward_skb().
>
> The xmit() function accessing the peer ptr is protected by an RCU read
> critical section. The rcu_read_lock() is functionally redundant as since
> v5.0 all softirqs are implicitly RCU read critical sections; but it is
> useful for human readers.
>
> If another CPU is concurrently in nsim_destroy(), then it will first set
> the peer ptr to NULL. This does not affect any existing readers that
> dereferenced a non-NULL peer. Then, in unregister_netdevice(), there is
> a synchronize_rcu() before the netdev is actually unregistered and
> freed. This ensures that any readers i.e. xmit() that got a non-NULL
> peer will complete before the netdev is freed.
>
> Any readers after the RCU_INIT_POINTER() but before synchronize_rcu()
> will dereference NULL, making it safe.
>
> The codepath to nsim_destroy() and nsim_create() takes both the newly
> added nsim_dev_list_lock and rtnl_lock. This makes it safe with
> concurrent calls to linking two netdevsims together.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Wei <dw@...idwei.uk>
> ---
> drivers/net/netdevsim/netdev.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> drivers/net/netdevsim/netdevsim.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdev.c b/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdev.c
> index 9063f4f2971b..13d3e1536451 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdev.c
> @@ -29,19 +29,37 @@
> static netdev_tx_t nsim_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> {
> struct netdevsim *ns = netdev_priv(dev);
> + unsigned int len = skb->len;
> + struct netdevsim *peer_ns;
> + int ret = NETDEV_TX_OK;
>
> if (!nsim_ipsec_tx(ns, skb))
> goto out;
>
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + peer_ns = rcu_dereference(ns->peer);
> + if (!peer_ns)
> + goto out_stats;
Change ret to NET_XMIT_DROP to correctly count packets as dropped
> +
> + skb_tx_timestamp(skb);
> + if (unlikely(dev_forward_skb(peer_ns->netdev, skb) == NET_RX_DROP))
> + ret = NET_XMIT_DROP;
> +
> +out_stats:
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> u64_stats_update_begin(&ns->syncp);
> - ns->tx_packets++;
> - ns->tx_bytes += skb->len;
> + if (ret == NET_XMIT_DROP) {
> + ns->tx_dropped++;
add dev_kfree_skb(skb);
Thanks,
Maciek
> + } else {
> + ns->tx_packets++;
> + ns->tx_bytes += len;
> + }
> u64_stats_update_end(&ns->syncp);
> + return ret;
>
> out:
> dev_kfree_skb(skb);
> -
> - return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static void nsim_set_rx_mode(struct net_device *dev)
> @@ -70,6 +88,7 @@ nsim_get_stats64(struct net_device *dev, struct rtnl_link_stats64 *stats)
> start = u64_stats_fetch_begin(&ns->syncp);
> stats->tx_bytes = ns->tx_bytes;
> stats->tx_packets = ns->tx_packets;
> + stats->tx_dropped = ns->tx_dropped;
> } while (u64_stats_fetch_retry(&ns->syncp, start));
> }
>
> @@ -302,7 +321,6 @@ static void nsim_setup(struct net_device *dev)
> eth_hw_addr_random(dev);
>
> dev->tx_queue_len = 0;
> - dev->flags |= IFF_NOARP;
> dev->flags &= ~IFF_MULTICAST;
> dev->priv_flags |= IFF_LIVE_ADDR_CHANGE |
> IFF_NO_QUEUE;
> diff --git a/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdevsim.h b/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdevsim.h
> index c8b45b0d955e..553c4b9b4f63 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdevsim.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdevsim.h
> @@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ struct netdevsim {
>
> u64 tx_packets;
> u64 tx_bytes;
> + u64 tx_dropped;
> struct u64_stats_sync syncp;
>
> struct nsim_bus_dev *nsim_bus_dev;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists