[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZcoLfSBNtfgmeKaI@codewreck.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 21:13:49 +0900
From: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>,
Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net>, v9fs@...ts.linux.dev,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] 9p/trans_fd: remove Excess kernel-doc comment
Randy Dunlap wrote on Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 08:33:41PM -0800:
> Remove the "@req" kernel-doc description since there is not 'req'
> member in the struct p9_conn.
>
> Fixes one kernel-doc warning:
> trans_fd.c:133: warning: Excess struct member 'req' description in 'p9_conn'
>
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Sorry for the lack of reply, I intended to take the patch when the next
""real"" patch comes in but it doesn't look like we'll get much activity
this cycle so I've just queued it up to -next.
Thanks!
FWIW, I contemplated adding
Fixes: 6d35190f3953 ("9p: Rename req to rreq in trans_fd")
but that's basically been forever so I don't think anyone will care
about backports -- and I'm both surprised and ashamed I didn't see this
W=1 warning earlier, I thought I regularly build with that...
--
Dominique
Powered by blists - more mailing lists