[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240212071216.21e36c5c@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 07:12:16 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>
Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, Jose Abreu
<joabreu@...opsys.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Maxime
Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, Yannick Vignon
<yannick.vignon@....com>, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
<bigeasy@...utronix.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: stmmac: Simplify mtl IRQ status checking
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 13:17:37 +0100 Kurt Kanzenbach wrote:
> On Thu Feb 08 2024, Kurt Kanzenbach wrote:
> > Commit 8a7cb245cf28 ("net: stmmac: Do not enable RX FIFO overflow
> > interrupts") disabled the RX FIFO overflow interrupts. However, it left the
> > status variable around, but never checks it.
> >
> > As stmmac_host_mtl_irq_status() returns only 0 now, the code can be
> > simplified.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>
>
> why did this got marked as Changes Requested. What changes have to be
> made?
Sorry, restored!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists