netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: phy: qca807x: move interface mode check to .config_init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7c5dd47c-26b9-4a12-af93-6139ae85e864@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 20:48:16 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Robert Marko <robimarko@...il.com>
Cc: andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, hkallweit1@...il.com,
	linux@...linux.org.uk, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
	kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, ansuelsmth@...il.com,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: phy: qca807x: move interface mode check to
 .config_init_once

On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 07:09:04PM +0100, Robert Marko wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 at 15:51, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 12:49:34PM +0100, Robert Marko wrote:
> > > Currently, we are checking whether the PHY package mode matches the
> > > individual PHY interface modes at PHY package probe time, but at that time
> > > we only know the PHY package mode and not the individual PHY interface
> > > modes as of_get_phy_mode() that populates it will only get called once the
> > > netdev to which PHY-s are attached to is being probed and thus this check
> > > will always fail and return -EINVAL.
> > >
> > > So, lets move this check to .config_init_once as at that point individual
> > > PHY interface modes should be populated.
> >
> > Just for my own understanding, not directly about this patch...
> >
> > priv->package_mode is about PSGMII vs QSGMII for one of the SERDES
> > interfaces? We expect the individual PHYs sharing that interface to
> > also indicate PSGMII or QSGMII?
> 
> Yes, that is the idea, all of the individual PHY-s in the package
> should be indicating
> the same PHY interface mode.
> 
> >
> > But what about the other SERDES, which can be connected to an SFP
> > cage. You would normally set that to SGMII, or 1000BaseX. When an SFP
> > module is inserted, the correct interface mode is then determined from
> > the contests of the EEPROM and the PCS needs to be reconfigured. So
> > i'm just wondering how this check works in this situation?
> 
> I just went to retest SFP support and it works as intended, as soon as the SFP
> is inserted, PHY will get reconfigured to "combo" mode so that fifth PHY can
> support both fiber (100Base-FX or 1000Base-X) or regular copper connections.
> 
> So, the check will not interfere with SFP support.

So for the port with the SFP you also have phy-mode of PSGMII or
QSGMII? That then gets changed when the SFP is hot plugged?

	Andrew