[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ed6af49-610f-4df4-ae06-22a85e052dbb@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 10:45:47 +0100
From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
To: Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>,
Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 RESEND 4/6] bitmap: Introduce bitmap_off()
On 12/02/2024 08.56, Herve Codina wrote:
> The bitmap_onto() function translates one bitmap relative to another but
> no function are present to perform the reverse translation.
>
> Introduce bitmap_off() to fill this hole.
>
> Signed-off-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>
> ---
> include/linux/bitmap.h | 3 +++
> lib/bitmap.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
This patch, or the next in the series, should include a diffstat
mentioning lib/test_bitmap.c. And please make sure that the tests
exercise both expected use as well as corner cases, so that the actual
expected behavior is documented in code and not just in prose (which may
be ambiguous), and so that behavior-changing refactorings will not go
unnoticed.
Rasmus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists